CEO Opportunity · Private Prep

Operations Dashboard

API management & AI/MCP-gateway platform (tyk.io). Founded 2014, London, remote-first. Via Dakota Horn, Bespoke Partners.

~$20M ARR · ~7% growth $35M Series B (2021, SEP + MMC) Profitable · ~$5M cash

~$20M

ARR

per Dakota / spec; independent est. ~$18M

~7%

YoY growth

target: 20-25%+

<100%

NRR

spec says "restore" — under water today

<90%

GRR

spec says "restore" — under water today

EBITDA+

Profitability

target margin 5-10% while investing

~$5M

Cash on hand

per Pontus, Aug 17 call; not burning

Visionary

2025 Gartner MQ

Leader only in 2023; down since

4.7★

G2 / Gartner Peer rating

92 reviews — best-in-class, small base

~$40M

Total raised

$5M Series A (2019) + $35M Series B (2021)

51-200

Employees

per Gartner Peer Insights; not confirmed internally

$30M

ARR target, 24mo

$33-37M at 36mo, per Aug 9 spec

2014

Founded

open-source project → enterprise platform

Healthy / on-thesis Watch Below target / needs restoring Context / unconfirmed

The pitch, in one paragraph

One of the very few established, independent, modern API-management platforms at global enterprise scale, sitting at the intersection of two converging markets: full-lifecycle API management and the emerging AI-gateway / MCP-governance category. Profitable, product fundamentals are strong, blue-chip logos (Apple, Deloitte, Capital One, NatWest, T-Mobile, Dollar General named on tyk.io). The job is not a turnaround — it's sharpening ICP, tightening enterprise GTM discipline, and re-accelerating growth that has stalled at ~7% against a 20-25%+ mandate, while restoring retention and building real US enterprise presence.

Status

Aug 7

Dakota Horn (Bespoke) surfaces Tyk — "definitely interesting," "squarely in your wheelhouse."

Aug 9

Position spec received: quantified mandate, NRR/GRR restoration flagged, founder count discrepancy noted.

Aug 13

Intro booked — with board Chairman Pontus Noren, not a founder.

Aug 17

Pontus Noren call held. Landed well — AI Studio framed as underused lever, Kong/Gravitee named competitors.

Aug 18-19

Martin Brennan (SEP) call confirmed for Thu Aug 20, 9:00 AM ET. Comp ($500K/$200K) shared with Dakota — possible "sticker shock" flagged, 3 other candidates in process.

Martin Brennan (SEP), Thu Aug 20, 9am ET. Founder intro (James, possibly Martin Buhr) still to be scheduled.

Founders

The spec names two; Dakota's original framing named three (one NZ, two London) — reconcile at the founder intro.

Martin Buhr	Founder & current CEO. Founders + SEP agreed to bring in a professional CEO; expect Buhr to shift toward product/vision. Confirm his forward title and role.
James Hirst	Co-founder & COO, London-based. Public blog voice on Tyk's distribution problem (see Market tab).
Andrew Murray	Third co-founder per tyk.io's own "About" page; not named in the Aug 9 draft spec. The discrepancy itself is worth asking about directly.

Board & SEP deal team

Scottish Equity Partners (SEP) led the 2021 Series B; MMC Ventures participated.

Pontus Noren	Board Chairman since 2020. Co-founded/ran Cloudreach to a 2017 Blackstone-backed exit; Cisco/Ericsson/Nokia before that. First call held Aug 17 — landed well.
Keith Davidson	SEP Partner who led the 2021 investment, joined the Tyk board as NED. Now Co-Managing Partner at SEP (since Oct 2025) — likely senior-sponsor, not day-to-day.
Martin Brennan	SEP Director, deal origination UK/Ireland/Europe. NEXT CALL: Thu Aug 20, 9am ET.
Paul Neeson / Taylor Rampton	SEP Director (Scotland, portfolio monitoring) / Principal (on the original 2021 deal team). Both listed on SEP's current Tyk team.

Recruiter chain

Dakota Horn, Director at Bespoke Partners (works with Catherine Baker; ex-True Search), sourcing this alongside the now-lukewarm Cytracom seat. Chelsea Cepeda (Bespoke) handles scheduling logistics.

Threat radar

Direct competitive set and the emerging AI-gateway front.

Full-lifecycle API management incumbents (med). Kong, Gravitee, IBM, Axway, MuleSoft — the named Leaders in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant. CONFIRMED via Tyk's own Dec 2025 company page: Tyk itself sits in the Visionary quadrant of the 2025 MQ, not Leaders — a real step below this set. Trajectory: Visionary 2020-22, Leader in 2023 (its one outlier year), back to Visionary for 2024 and 2025. Note: Tyk's own Oct 2024 blog described that year as "Challenger," inconsistent with the newer page calling it Visionary — a real inconsistency in their own materials.

AI-gateway / MCP-security entrants (watch). Fast-moving and crowded with both API-management incumbents and AI-native startups. Named players: Kong shipped AI Gateway inside Konnect ($345M raised, $2B valuation, $100M+ ARR, profitable). Solo.io's kgateway/MCP Gateway is CNCF open source, $1B valuation, ~$175M raised. Cloudflare AI Gateway leans on free-tier edge distribution; LiteLLM sets a free, self-hosted floor. Most consequential: Portkey (open-source MCP Gateway, 1,600+ LLM support) raised a $15M Series A Feb 2026, then was acquired by Palo Alto Networks within months (announced Apr 30, closed Jun 1, 2026) into Prisma AIRS — proof the category is real and that well-capitalized security incumbents are buying directly into it.

Market sizing — two different numbers

Tyk's own position spec: ~$3.2B measured APIM, $7-9B broader (potentially $20-40B by early 2030s), AI-gateway sub-category still just ~$50-100M today. Independent research firms size it very differently: ~$8.6-$10.3B in 2026, 16-25% CAGR. The gap is likely definitional (narrow tooling spend vs. broader API-first business spend) — worth asking Martin which number SEP underwrote the growth plan against.

Where Tyk actually sits

Positioned in the gap between Kong's open-source-first/developer-led motion and Apigee/MuleSoft's enterprise-heavyweight motion — full stack (gateway, dashboard, portal, analytics) at a price mid-size orgs can afford. G2/Gartner Peer: 4.7★ (92 reviews) vs. Apigee 4.5★ (173) and MuleSoft 4.3★ (194) — best-in-class satisfaction, much smaller base. Real and defensible, but exposed if Kong moves down-market or Apigee/MuleSoft bundle AI-gateway features into platforms customers already budget for.

James Hirst, publicly (Jul 30, 2026): Tyk's co-founder argued open source is no longer a distribution engine — "it was the engine. Now it's the paperwork" — because developers now ask an AI assistant instead of hunting GitHub, and models recommend the same pre-ranked handful of established names. Read against the 7% growth and sub-100% NRR, this is the most candid internal explanation yet for why the number is soft: the top of the funnel may be structurally broken, not just under-managed.

The quantified mandate (per Aug 9 draft spec)

A real, underwritable number — roughly a double in 3 years off a profitable base, not a moonshot.

Target	Value
ARR growth rate	From ~7% to 20-25%+ annually
ARR in 24 months	~$30M (from ~$20M base)
ARR in 36 months	~$33-37M
Net revenue retention	Restore above 100% (currently under)
Gross revenue retention	Restore to at least 90% (currently under)
Adjusted EBITDA	Stay positive while investing; target 5-10% margin
Geography	Build materially stronger US enterprise presence and leadership footprint; explicit US-based-CEO requirement

Named competency bar: CEO/GM/COO/CRO-to-President in B2B SaaS/infra software; scaled a recurring-revenue business through $20-40M+ ARR; enterprise GTM rebuild (ICP, segmentation, pricing/packaging, expansion); board/investor credibility with transaction experience; distributed global operating-model design; founder-partnership maturity. The one named stretch: direct APIM/open-source technical credibility is listed as additive, not required.

The retention problem, unpacked

The mandate says "restore" NRR above 100% and GRR to at least 90% — meaning both are under water today. Sub-100% NRR at only 7% growth means new logos are carrying the entire number while the base erodes. The top diligence question: is churn concentrated in SMB/open-source-tier attrition (survivable, a mix problem) or in enterprise logos leaving for Kong/Apigee (a product/competitive problem that changes the thesis)? Not yet answered — a priority for the founder intro.

Full process timeline

Aug 7

Dakota Horn (Bespoke) call: Tyk surfaced as a second, separate mandate alongside Cytracom. "Definitely interested."

Aug 9

Position spec (draft) received. Quantified mandate; NRR/GRR restoration flagged; founder-count discrepancy (2 in spec vs. 3 per Dakota) noted; market sizing given (~$3.2B measured, AI-gateway ~$50-100M).

Aug 9

Updated resume sent to Bespoke: "Tyk appears to be a great fit." Formal candidacy.

Jul 30 (surfaced later)

James Hirst's public post on the death of Tyk's open-source distribution engine.

Aug 13

Intro booked — but with board Chairman Pontus Noren rather than a founder. Worth reading either way (governance vetting first, or Noren driving the hire).

Aug 17

Pontus Noren call (56m). AI Studio called the underused $5-10M lever; EBITDA-positive with ~$5M cash; named competitors Kong and Gravitee (plus hyperscalers); CloudBees Jenkins-pivot pitched as the direct blueprint.

Aug 17-18

Warm post-call exchange with Pontus. Bespoke sets up Martin Brennan (SEP) in parallel.

Aug 18-19

Comp shared with Dakota: $500K/$200K. Possible "sticker shock" flagged; 3 other candidates confirmed in process. Martin Brennan call locked: Thu Aug 20, 9:00 AM ET.

Martin Brennan (SEP), Thu Aug 20, 9am ET. Founder intro (James / possibly Martin Buhr) still being scheduled.

Open questions by stakeholder

To close before a decision point.

Martin / SEP: which market-sizing figure underwrote the growth plan; comp structure flexibility given "sticker shock"; SEP's timeline/appetite for a liquidity event; appetite for another raise to fund the US build-out.

Founders (James / Martin Buhr): reconcile the 2-vs-3-founder discrepancy and each founder's forward role/title; whether James's public "open source is dead as distribution" view is shared internally; what specifically drove the retention slippage.

Board: Tyk's confirmed 2025 Gartner MQ standing beyond the "Visionary" self-report; how the board reads that placement (lagging indicator of growth, or separate perception issue).

Data (post-NDA): churn mix (SMB/OSS vs. enterprise-to-Kong/Apigee), cohort retention actuals, pipeline and win-loss, customer concentration.

Risk register

Key risks to the opportunity and the business.

Risk	Severity	Mitigation / note
Retention leak: NRR <100%, GRR <90%	High	Diligence the churn mix before over-committing to a growth number that assumes it's fixed
Slow current growth (~7% vs. 20-25%+ target)	High	Whole thesis rests on materially re-accelerating this; understand why it stalled first
Gartner MQ slipped to Visionary (was Leader in 2023 only)	Medium	Ask Martin directly whether the board reads this as a lagging growth indicator or a separate perception problem
Crowded, better-funded competitive set	High	Kong ($2B val, $100M+ ARR), Gravitee ($125M raised), IBM, Axway, MuleSoft, Apigee — winning enterprise share is the whole job
AI-gateway window may not stay open	Medium	Portkey/Palo Alto Networks acquisition shows security incumbents buying directly into this space now
Founder/geography discrepancy (2 vs. 3 founders)	Medium	Reconcile at the founder intro; understand who actually stays operational
Founder overhang, not a clean succession	Medium	Spec explicit: founders stay "actively involved for the foreseeable future." Decision rights must be nailed down in writing
Comp "sticker shock" flagged by Dakota	Medium	3 other candidates in process; the Martin Brennan call is where this gets tested for real, not secondhand
Remote-first execution challenge	Medium	Pontus's own flag: driving urgency without a shared office to walk into. Real, but matches how I already run CoreStory
AI-gateway narrative vs. near-term revenue	Low-Med	Per the spec's own sizing, AI-gateway is still ~$50-100M; the 24-month number has to come from core enterprise APIM

Comp position (as shared with Dakota, Aug 18-19)

$500K base / $200K bonus shared as the anchor. Dakota flagged the board may have "sticker shock." Three other candidates confirmed in the process. Approach for the Martin Brennan call: don't lead by defending or softening the number — reframe it against the value-creation plan (20-25%+ growth, $30M ARR in 24 months, US build-out) rather than a market-rate argument, and go in open to a conversation about structure (cash vs. equity/milestone mix) rather than a fixed number.

Illustrative equity outcomes (placeholder, no offer exists yet)

Estimate only: 4% fully-diluted / $30M preference stack ahead of common, an assumption pending real terms. Tyk raised $40M total (Series A + B), so the real preference stack could be materially different.

Exit value	2% common	4% common (est.)	6% common
$150M	$2.4M	$4.8M	$7.2M
$300M	$5.4M	$10.8M	$16.2M
$500M	$9.4M	$18.8M	$28.2M

Gross-of-preference math: (Exit − $30M pref) × common%. Illustrative only until the real preference stack, option pool, grant size, and acceleration terms are confirmed. See the equity model on options.mikelambert.com for the live, editable version of this calculation.

Open items before signing: preference amount and participating vs. non-participating terms, option pool sizing, actual grant %, vesting schedule, and change-of-control acceleration.

Growth mandate model

Stress-test the spec's own targets (20-25%+ growth, $30M ARR in 24mo, $33-37M in 36mo). Inputs save in your browser.

Current ARR ($M)

Assumed YoY growth (%)

NRR assumption (%)

Adjusted EBITDA margin (%)

Cash on hand ($M)

ARR at 24 months

ARR at 36 months

Gap to $30M target (24mo)

Rule of 40 (est.)

ARR at 24/36mo compounds the assumed growth rate over the current ARR. Gap to target compares the 24-month result against the spec's ~$30M target (green if met or ahead, red if short). Rule of 40 = growth% + adjusted EBITDA margin%. All illustrative — NRR shown for reference but not yet wired into the compounding (retention drag is qualitative until real cohort data is available post-NDA).

Pros / cons (synced from the options.mikelambert.com decision board)

My current read, weighed against CoreStory and the other live options.

Pros

Squarely on-thesis: API management + AI/MCP gateway is technical-infrastructure software, my bullseye, and the MCP-securing angle is what drew me to their booth in Vegas in June.
Real CEO seat: founders + SEP have already agreed to bring in a professional CEO, so the mandate and authority are clear going in.
A GTM problem, not a product turnaround: profitable, strong product fundamentals, blue-chip logos (Apple). Sharpen ICP, tighten enterprise GTM, re-accelerate — exactly my game.
Remote-first, and the spec REQUIRES a US-based CEO leading across US/UK/Europe: no relocation, and distributed-operating-model experience is a named competency, not a gap.
Quantified, achievable mandate: roughly a double in three years off a profitable base, not a moonshot — a number I can underwrite and negotiate equity against.

Cons

Slow growth: ~$20M ARR growing only ~7% YoY — the upside case depends entirely on re-accelerating it materially.
Retention is leaking: NRR and GRR are both under the mandate's "restore" targets today. Sub-100% NRR at 7% growth means new logos are carrying everything while the base erodes.
Founder/geography complexity: 2-vs-3-founder discrepancy, and this is explicitly NOT a succession — founders stay "actively involved for the foreseeable future." Decision rights must be nailed down in writing.
The AI/MCP-gateway angle that drew me in is still a ~$50-100M category per the spec's own sizing — narrative and option value, not near-term revenue.
Crowded, better-funded competitive set (Kong, Gravitee, MuleSoft, IBM, Axway/Apigee) — and Tyk itself sits in Visionary, not Leaders, in the 2025 Gartner MQ.

Bottom line so far: strongest fit among the live opportunities on thesis and mandate clarity. The two things that would change my read materially: what the churn-mix diligence shows, and whether Martin Brennan's call resolves the comp gap constructively or surfaces a harder ceiling.